The thinning of the Mediterranean crust below the Sirte Basin and the Ionian Sea has been evidenced recently by gravity inversion (Cowie and Kusznir, 2012). Cowie and Kusznir have also noted that the nature of the crust could be either oceanic or thinned continental. On their second profile, which transects the Herodotus Basin the transform nature of the basin margin i.e the sudden increase of crustal thickness is more prominent, as a consequence most probably the masterfault of basin opening was localized on the southern basin margin of the Mediterranean Sea.
In our interpretation, gravity profile from Fig.20 is showing additional arguments for the transtensional origin of the Mediterranean crust. Here, contrary to the southern margin, crustal thinning was enabled by overstepping strike-slip faults. The crustal thinning mechanism cannot be understood solely from the published profiles, but certainly must be sought in those of transtensional strike-slip basins.
Southern transform margin of the Mediterranean Basin (Matruh-Herodotus Basin)
An ENE-ESE opening of the East Mediterranean area related to a transform margin was documented by several authors (Longacre et al., 2007; Walley, 1998, 2001) in (Tari et al., 2012), and indeed strike-slip tectonics suggested by gravity profiles (Cowie and Kusznir, 2012) is supported by seismic profiles as well. Reinterpreting a composite profile across the Matruh-Herodotus Basin margin, we have concluded that it is likely, that an important amount of the structural traps identified in the Matruh Basin were generated by the local Neogene transpressional stress regime. Actually, down-dip contractional horses interpreted by (Tari et al., 2012) might originate partly in strike-slip deformation than solely in gravitational sliding on a Cretaceous shale detachment, as indicated by the presence of numerous antithetic faults. The NNE-SSW Matruh Canyon itself, described by Tari as an aborted syn-rift basin, it is overlaying a Jurassic(?)-Cretaceous transtensional shear zone, most probably initiated as a plate-scale tension fracture, which is depicting the whole coeval North African stress regimes. Interestingly, the main strike of the basin is parallel with those of the NOSA zone in Tunis, which also belongs to the Sirte Microplate in our plate tectonic subdivision.
The Eratosthenes Sea Mount of the Levantine basin was reimaged recently with modern processing techniques (Peace et al., 2012). Around the Eratosthenes seamount, two sets of strike-slip faults can be differentiated highlighting the transpressional origin of the seamount. This crustal fragment initially it constituted a footwall segment of the Levantine Basin, related to a major transtensional fault, which later got inverted with the evolution of the local stress-regime along the main displacement zone. Stratigraphy given in Fig. 22 is very uncertain; layering is rather reflecting seismic packages than established stratigraphic units.
Northern margin of the Mediterranean Basin
The Corinth Trough (Fig. 26) can be described as a 1-2 Ma old, ~100X30km high-strain band, which shows 5-15mm/year N-S extension (Bell et al., 2009), and segmented, overstepping boundary faults in plain view. Bell is referring to three prevailing theories which are used to explain basin extension: 1) back-arc extension related to the Hellenic Trench, 2) westward propagation of the North Anatolian fault (Dewey and Şengör, 1979), 3) gravitational collapse of the Hellenide orogeny lithosphere (Jolivet, 2001).
In the frame of GSST, the Corinth Trough is interpreted as an internal shear zone of the South Anatolian Nanoplate, which has developed internally an overstepping fault network in the principal displacement zone (PDZ), instead of a continuous masterfault. Given the significant space created in the releasing bend of the PDZ, gravitational collapse proposed by Jolivet (2001) is regarded as a complimentary effect of the regional strike-slip tectonic deformation.
The Vøring Basin, offshore Norway
Within the Vøring Basin, several compressional (Cenomanian-Turonian, Maastrichtian-Paleocene, Middle Miocene) and extensional collapse phases (Paleozoic, Late Jurassic, Early Cretaceous hyperextension, Late Paleocene, Early Eocene) have been documented (Lundin et al., 2013). Overviewing Lundin’s data, we have noted that the ‘early’ (Permian–Jurassic) tension fractures in many places have evolved into overstepping strike-slip faults and several isolated subbasins formed. It should be also noted, that main (SSW-NNE trending) sedimentary trenches, are cut by further W-E striking strike-slip systems in the continuation of mid-oceanic transforms, giving birth to complex structural patterns. During periods of inversion, i.e. when structural blocks have arrived into restraining phase, some fault blocks evolved into push-up ranges, like the Vema Dome (Fig. 24), which has been formed in the Middle Miocene.
Published in: Kovács, J.Sz., 2015 (in press), Elements of Global Strike-Slip Tectonics: a Quasi-Neotectonic Analysis, Journal of Global Strike-Slip Tectonics, v1., Szekler Academic Press, Sfintu Gheorghe.